Digital Video

August 02, 2007

High Definition Camera at the end of a boom pole

Posted by Martin:

I've only caught a little bit of The Kill Point on Spike TV.  But I found this interesting tidbit of production news at the Creative Cow.

The show is using the Iconix HD-RH1 Video Camera.Iconix_icecube0008

From the post at the Cow:

Featuring a camera head about the size of a golf ball, and weighing a mere two ounces, the remote head system of the Iconix HD-RH1 can keep pace with larger HD video cameras, yet is versatile enough to offer 35 different format and frame rate combinations. "We're able to feed the Iconix footage into an SRW1 recording deck, essentially feeding it a 4:2:2 signal with much less compression than, say, an HDCam deck," Dunk explains. "That's really what prompted me to get it on the show."

Wow, now that is cool.

Click here to read the rest of the post.

July 30, 2007

P2 Workflow from a News shooter

Posted By Nathan and Martin:

Nathan McCann is a shooter I use on projects, and I have always been pleased to work with him.  He makes his living shooting news for local tv station.  He website is currently under "reconstruction" to use his words.  But he shoots for NBC 12, and they shoot on Panasonic's P2 technology and I wanted to see his opinion of what it is like to use this relatively new technology.  P2_card

Here is what he has to say:

My name’s Nathan McCann and I shoot the news with Richmond’s NBC station, WWBT. Martin wanted an inside view of Panasonic’s P2 technology from someone familiar with it. I’m not an engineer so I can’t give you all the mind-numbing technical low-down, but I’m shooting with it all day, every day as a news photog so I can give you that perspective.

 

P2 is fantastic. I started shooting on mini-DV, then shot on BetaSP tape at my first news job. I switched to P2 when I started at NBC12 and for what we do there’s no substitute. I’ve got no ties to the company, I’m just a happy user.

 

Here’s a brief run-down of the gear we use. We’re shooting with Panasonic’s broadcast-style P2 camera, the AJ-SPC700. We each carry three 8 GB P2 cards which gives us 101 minutes at the video format we shoot in (DVC 25). We’re editing non-linearly on desktop PC’s at the station and on laptops in the live trucks and satellite truck.Ajspc700

 

Basic workflow is pretty simple. You shoot on the card just like shooting to tape. The camera breaks each shot into its own separate clip. If you want to watch your footage in the field, you just pop out the LCD screen on the camera’s side and each clip is shown as a thumbnail. Think of the thumbnail view in a non-linear editor. You can view each clip, copy clips to other cards, and delete clips all in the camera. When you get back to the station to edit there’s a special drive built into the computer with five P2 slots and you just click your cards in. You open a bin and all your clips are there, thumbnail style. You can select the clips to download and then you just drag them in to your project folder for transfer to the hard drive. Transfer is significantly faster that real-time. I’m not sure the exact speed, but it’s close to 5x real-time.

 

Those are the basics. Where P2 really shines is in the little techniques you can use to speed up your day. Here are a few examples:

 

1) There was a major incident at a local high school a while back. Three of our news teams showed up, all shooting footage at the same time. We quickly realized it was nothing that deserved six of us (a student had let off some mace) so two teams decided to leave. One team was staying to do a live shot, though and wanted the footage of the other two teams to cut into the story going out to air. One team had shot all their other footage for the day so they just left the live crew with the single P2 card of the school footage. I didn’t want to leave my card because I had other stories to shoot, so I used my camera to copy all my school footage onto one of the cards that was staying on scene. Then I wipe my original card. So the live crew gets all their footage and I get to save all my disk space for later.

 

2) I was going to do a live shot in front of where city council was meeting. The meeting started at 6 PM but the producers wanted stories in the 5 PM and 6 PM shows. I needed video for the 5 and 6 stories so I was going to grab file video and use it to cut the stories in the live truck. In the old days you’d grab a tape labeled “City Council B-roll.” Yawn. Instead, I used our archive system to pull into an edit bay copies of our most recent Council stories. Then I exported the stories as .avi’s directly onto a P2 card. The card can act, basically, like a big thumb drive. So when I got on scene I popped the P2 card into the computer and downloaded the clip, treating the P2 card like an external drive. Downside, you can’t view the file clips in the camera. Upside, you’re not carrying around a bunch of tapes and you’re transferring the file at faster-than-real-time.

 

3) I’m shooting football. I know nothing about football, I’ll be honest. I basically aim at the ball and hope someone runs near me with it. Because I’m totally clueless I have no idea when a big play is shaping up. Enter the Pre-Record function. Setting the camera to Pre-Record makes it dump everything it sees onto a buffer. The second I hit Record, it starts recording a clip BUT it also tacks all the footage in the buffer on to the start of that clip. So the play starts, but I don’t hit Record yet because I have no clue if this is a big play or not. I watch the play and five seconds in the quarterback gets tackled. I hit Record two seconds afterward then stop recording when the play’s over. The buffer holds sixteen seconds, so the footage of my final clip actually starts sixteen seconds before I hit Record. As long as I had the camera pointed at the play, I get the footage of the entire thing. Not only is it great for sports, it’s also good for shooting lightning. Just aim at the sky and hit the button after the strike, you don’t have to burn tape just waiting for it to happen.

 

4) Shooting on a tight deadline happens all the time in news. There are days I get back to the station five minutes before air time and have to bang out a quick piece for the start of the show. Times like this even the 5x real-time download with kill my chance to make air. With P2, though, I have the option to skip the download and edit straight from the card. Pop the cards in the computer, open up the bin, and all your clips are there. Instead of downloading them, you just treat them like they’re already downloaded. Drag them in to the NLE, trim them, then paste them to the timeline. So why bother to download at all? Simple: when you edit straight from the card, the NLE copies to the hard drive only the footage you put on the timeline (with handles). For a quick job that’s no problem. If you’re doing a longer piece, though, you’ll probably end up going back and moving your edit points around. If you move your points beyond the handles of the original clip you have to redo the entire edit.

 

A couple other observations about P2:

 

The cameras and cards are completely solid-state, no moving parts. This stuff is rock-solid. I’ve seldom seen it just up and fail. True, the cameras aren’t much more than a year old, but keep in mind how we use them. These aren’t wedding cameras. They’re at fires and out in the heat and bouncing around police cars. They see the world. And I haven’t seen more than three or four examples of things breaking.

 

Some stations have selected direct hard drive capture (ie Firestore) over P2 technology. The big advantage of P2 over things like Firestore, in my experience, is the ability to put different footage on different cards. If I shoot two interviews for two different reporters I can just put the footage on two separate cards. Back at the station I just give each reporter their specific card. Not exactly an option with a single drive.

 

P2 cards fit in the standard PCMCIA card slot. With the right software you can just pop a P2 card in a laptop and start editing. You only get a single card’s worth of footage at a time, but you don’t have to worry about a separate card reader.

 

The biggest downside for P2 is the cost of the cards. Shooting on tape, if you wanted to save some footage you just stuck the tape in your desk and left it there. Not so with P2. With P2 you develop a sort of psychic link with your cards. You know exactly where they are at all times and who has them, because if they get lost that’s lots and lots of money. Of course, with the dropping price of archiving systems saving file footage to the network isn’t that big a deal anymore so the downside will be less of an issue in the future.

July 23, 2007

300 and Zodiac comes to DVD. Tell me again what is the "filmlook?"

Posted by Martin:

This is an update of a post I wrote back in March when 300 and Zodiac were out in the theaters.

Zodiac comes to DVD tomorrow and 300 comes arrives on the 31st on DVD, HD-DVD, and Blu-Ray.

300 is a complete CGI-Fest shot on 35mm.  Zodiac is a tense, moody, atmospheric film shot on HD.

There is a statement I've seen around produce circles that "if you want the filmlook shoot film." 

After seeing Zodiac I no longer agree with that thinking.  How about you?  Check out Zodiac tomorrow and see what you think.

Here is the original post:

This post on The Genesis Project blog by Dennis Radeke about the "Film Look" in video got me thinking about does that term. Does the "film look" mean as much as it did just 3 years ago? In other words can "video" be indistinguishable with film?  And using two movies that are currently in your local theaters, 300 and Zodiac, we can look at what film looks like and what video looks like.

300, see my review here, is the current blockbuster du jour and it is a good one.  It has opened some eyes has to what really can be done with green screen.  The entire movie was shot in front of a giant green and therefore added all additional elements later.  300 is not the first to do this, Sky Captain and the World of the Tomorrow was the first shot the entire movie in front of blue/green screen, but 300 has done a better job at making that world seem alive.  300 is a feast for the eyes and the senses.  It creates real worlds out of the computer and makes them seem physical and real.300_behind_the_sceens

Zodiac on the other hand is David Fincher at his best.  I didn't have the time to review Zodiac but I would definately recommend it, I believe that this is Fincher's best work yet, and it shakes Jake Gyllenhall's role from Brokeback Mountain out of your mind.  But this movie is all about mood and atmosphere, no emphasis on special effects here.  The story is creepy enough to keep you enthralled.  The movie is shot in shadows and poorly lit offices and at night time.  Zodiac is all about creepy and emotions without the shock and awe of high powered graphics.
Zodiac_behind_the_scenes
Not to say there were no visual effects in Zodiac.  There were a lot.  Recreating 1970s San Francisco was quite a task. 

Click here to read an incredible  film & video article about how that was done

Here is your pop quiz.  Which one was shot on 35 mm and which was shot on digital with no film?

Bueller....Buuuulller...Anyone...anyone...

300=35mm film

Zodiac=digital

I'm more surprised at 300.  With all the emphasis on digital work I would have thought that they would have chosen a completely digital work flow, maybe some nervous producer got in the way.

Zodiac on the other hand is a completely digital production, film doesn't get involved in the process until the prints are made to go to your local theater.

But if you have seen Zodiac, unless you were aware of the tech specs as I was, I very seriously doubt that anyone would have guess that it was a digital production.  Which is my ultimate point.  You no longer need film to make it look like film.

Yes, I know, I'm a heretic....

Many people have been striving to get video to be as attractive as 35mm film (not talking about larger 70mm or IMAX stocks at the moment folks...) and that days has truly arrived.

I'm of the George Lucas and Robert Roderiguez school of thinking, I would never shoot film again.

Click here to see the tech specs of 300.

Click here to see the tech specs of Zodiac.

Now lastly class your homework is to go and see "The Grindhouse" in April and turn in a comparison between the two sections of the movie, "Plant Terror" and "Death Proof".

Death Proof is directed by Quentin Tarantino and is shot in 35mm.

Planet Terror is directed by Robert Roderiguez and is shot digitally.

So bring back your posts after you see this fine piece of cinematic history and compare the looks between the two sections, can you tell a difference between 35 and digital?  But examples in one movie will be great fodder for this discussion on "The Film Look".

July 21, 2007

300 verses Zodiac "What is the film look?" [UPDATE]

Posted by Martin:

This post on The Genesis Project blog by Dennis Radeke about the "Film Look" in video got me thinking about does that term.  Does the "film look" mean as much as it did just 3 years ago? In other words can "video" be indistinguishable with film?  And using two movies that are currently in your local theaters, 300 and Zodiac, we can look at what film looks like and what video looks like.

300, see my review here, is the current blockbuster du jour and it is a good one.  It has opened some eyes has to what really can be done with green screen.  The entire movie was shot in front of a giant green and therefore added all additional elements later.  300 is not the first to do this, Sky Captain and the World of the Tomorrow was the first shot the entire movie in front of blue/green screen, but 300 has done a better job at making that world seem alive.  300 is a feast for the eyes and the senses.  It creates real worlds out of the computer and makes them seem physical and real.300_behind_the_sceens

Zodiac on the other hand is David Fincher at his best.  I didn't have the time to review Zodiac but I would definately recommend it, I believe that this is Fincher's best work yet, and it shakes Jake Gyllenhall's role from Brokeback Mountain out of your mind.  But this movie is all about mood and atmosphere, no emphasis on special effects here.  The story is creepy enough to keep you enthralled.  The movie is shot in shadows and poorly lit offices and at night time.  Zodiac is all about creepy and emotions without the shock and awe of high powered graphics.
Zodiac_behind_the_scenes
Not to say there were no visual effects in Zodiac.  There were a lot.  Recreating 1970s San Francisco was quite a task. 

Click here to read an incredible  film & video article about how that was done

Here is your pop quiz.  Which one was shot on 35 mm and which was shot on digital with no film?

Bueller....Buuuulller...Anyone...anyone...

300=35mm film

Zodiac=digital

I'm more surprised at 300.  With all the emphasis on digital work I would have thought that they would have chosen a completely digital work flow, maybe some nervous producer got in the way.

Zodiac on the other hand is a completely digital production, film doesn't get involved in the process until the prints are made to go to your local theater.

But if you have seen Zodiac, unless you were aware of the tech specs as I was, I very seriously doubt that anyone would have guess that it was a digital production.  Which is my ultimate point.  You no longer need film to make it look like film.

Yes, I know, I'm a heretic....

Many people have been striving to get video to be as attractive as 35mm film (not talking about larger 70mm or IMAX stocks at the moment folks...) and that days has truly arrived.

I'm of the George Lucas and Robert Roderiguez school of thinking, I would never shoot film again.

Click here to see the tech specs of 300.

Click here to see the tech specs of Zodiac.

Now lastly class your homework is to go and see "The Grindhouse" in April and turn in a comparison between the two sections of the movie, "Plant Terror" and "Death Proof".

Death Proof is directed by Quentin Tarantino and is shot in 35mm.

Planet Terror is directed by Robert Roderiguez and is shot digitally.

So bring back your posts after you see this fine piece of cinematic history and compare the looks between the two sections, can you tell a difference between 35 and digital?  But examples in one movie will be great fodder for this discussion on "The Film Look".

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

July 06, 2007

CustomFlix now offers HD-DVD production

Posted by Martin:

Customflix.com, an on demand DVD duplicator, replicator, and overall great place for independent videographers, is now offering HD-DVD distribution.  They're calling their new program 1000 HD-DVD indie projects.  The idea is to get good independent content on HD-DVD.  Microsoft is co-sponsor of this project, and Microsoft is an investor and supportor of HD-DVD.

If your project is selected then it will also be for sale on Amazon.com as well.

July 03, 2007

Working with LP setting in a professional situation

Posted by Martin:

My blogging rate has slowed since May due to my workload, which I'm not complaining about, but I wanted to post a bit about a project I had in May.

It was a dance recital, and it ran about 2 1/2 hours.  I was using three cameras to cover it, but I only had the budget to hire one other shooter.  As many people do in event videography, we sometimes have to use a stationary unmanned camera somewhere.  I hate, hate, hate, and hate some more to be placed in such a situation, but sometimes such is business.

The theater in which the recital was occurring and due to requests from the dance studio owner, I could only have two cameras on the floor, one in the back getting a wide shoot, and one from the side getting close-ups and cutaways.

But the previous videographer that worked with this dance studio also placed a camera overhead in the light rafters, which admittedly gave a view that could be interesting, and a view that the live audience didn't get.

Well, the overhead camera was to be the stationary and unmanned camera.  I still shutter at that thought because there were people up there running the lights.  One unintentional bump from them, and well you get the picture.  But here is where the choice to run the camera (an XL1s) on LP.  Because the first act would run over an hour, the standard time for a DV tape if I ran the camera in regular SP mode I wouldn't get the whole first act, or even the second act when that occurred.

So we decided to take the chance and set the XL1s in LP mode, to get 90 minutes on tape, which covered the first act.

LP in DV is different from LP in the old VHS days.  Video shot on LP in VHS was distinctly different and of lower quality than video shot in SP.  DV shot in LP, still lays down a digital signal, the same signal that is used when recording in normal SP.  The problem is that when shooting in LP, the possibility of dropouts increases.  The other shooter and I decided it was worth the risk because the overhead shot was not the main shot anyway, and if a drop out did occur I would simply cut away to another shot at that time.

But I was blessed by the video Gods, in three hours of footage not one frame of a dropout.  For those that care, I was using Panasonic tapes.

But the moral of this story is, that sometimes using "non-professional" settings can allow you to get the shot that is needed.  Now I do not recommend shooting in LP to save tape, but sometimes in a bind it may not be the disaster you are afraid of.Dance_studio_4

This is a frame grab from the camera running on LP.  It was a very cool shot.

May 23, 2007

Pirates Three to be widest digital projection release yet

Posted by Martin:

From CinemaTech, Pirates of the Caribbean 3 will be on more than 1000 digital screens.

Kudos to them.

And a Bottle of Rum....
Ads by AdGenta.com

May 03, 2007

U2 Vertigo Remix

Posted by Martin:

I've been a big fan of U2 since 1988.  I saw this remix of Vertigo and it took me a moment to realize that even a remix needs a new video.  Something to think about in terms of creating work.  "Oh sure...you already have a video for THAT version...but how about this one..."

April 14, 2007

Humpback Whales Video

Posted by Martin:

I am learning to use Revver video sharing.  This is footage I shot off the coast of Mexico a couple years ago.  I haven't been into making these short videos for YouTube, because YouTube takes the rights of the video you make.  Revver allows to keep the rights to your video, and make money with a click-through ad at the end of the video.  Plus if you share videos on your blog or where ever, you get a share of the revenue generated through your site.  I think it is a pretty cool way of doing things, and although the audience is smaller than YouTube, I hope people will catch on to making money with their short videos this way.

I hope you enjoy the Humpbacks!

March 07, 2007

Thoughts on the CanonHX A1

Posted by Martin:

I received this email the other day from a reader who has used the HX A1 and is comparing to the Sony HF X1/Z1.  I've posted the email and want to see what readers who have used it or the Sony HF X1/Z1 think.  The emailer says that English is not his main language so any spelling mistakes maybe attributed there.  Anyway here is the email:

I have tested the Canon HX A1. The resolution is fantastic (+/- 800 lignes horiz.). This A1 as not the problem of the HFX1/Z1. On this camcorders (H resolution (+/- 550 lines), there is a big problem: when you close the iris (between f4 and f11), the resolution is going very down. At F11, the picture is so blured that the auto focus works erraticaly. But, with the HX-A1, there is another problem: big red/green chromatic aberration in the corners on objects with hight contrast. The Canon is very ergonomic. I find it is the best choise a this moment.

So those of you that have used these cameras, would you agree?

MCT Images Main Site

Sponsored Links

  • Security Cameras - security cameras & video surveillance cctv systems for home and office video surveillance. call now 1-877-92m-cctv to customize your video surveillance system complete with security cameras
  • Adult Halloween Superhero Movie Tv Plus Size Costumes - www.halloweenadventure.com - buy your adult halloween superhero movie tv plus size costumes securely online or in our halloween costume stores nationwide!
    Security Cameras - Security Cameras & Video Surveillance CCTV Systems for home and office video surveillance. Call now 1-877-92M-CCTV to customize your video surveillance system complete with security cameras

MCT Images aStore

  • Visit my aStore

Join iStock here!

  • Join iStock here!
    View My Portfolio

Subscribe Here

Google Analytics

Tiller Photography

Wedding portfolio

  • _mg_9301
    Here I keep shots from weddings that I have shot.

Flicker Badge

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from mctiller. Make your own badge here.

ClickTale